Metapsychoanalysis is a scientific formalization describing the structure of our original love instincts, as expressed within the original diet conditions for which we evolved. It appears that the end of chemical disturbance of the brain gives access to a greatly appeased state of consciousness better than what a diligent meditator would reach after 15 years… but this has proven to simply be our natural state. Emotions and thinking processes change dramatically, to mirror reality more faithfully and harmoniously.
Sexual impulses - in males especially - calm down, ending the rule of the so-called
hormonal pressure, the imperious physiological need to fuck men suffer from: sexuality takes on a more spacious quality, fulfilling and subtle.
In this context metapsychoanalysis emerged, a theory overturning all human psychology and materialism and demonstrating the systematic apparition of extrasensory faculties such as visions of the past, present or future. It demonstrated not only the possibility, but utter naturalness and availability (in a raw context) of what pop culture refers to as precognition, intuitive comprehension or telepathy.
Metapsychoanalysis postulates (as supported by observations of primates and dolphins), is that the primary function of the (natural) sexual impulses is not, by far, reproduction but the creation and exchange of a
numinous energy as Jung used to say, allowing access to the metapsychic dimension, albeit in a reproducible way that stands to verifications. This paradigmatic shift in our very perception of reality could be the foundation of a new science at last growing out of its materialistic diapers.
The Absolute State of Love Today
We are taught that the perfect union involves a man and a woman couple, around the same age, from distant famiies… While some fetishes are considered
natural, evolutionary-driven (grown-ass women with big milky tits, the quintessential degrading maternal regression), others aren’t. While denying the ubiquity of homosexual couplings in nature has become impossible, it still doesn’t have any explanation better than the libido doesn’t really discriminate as long as that excess sexuality doesn’t undermine enough the fitness under natural selection1.
Meaning that these behaviors do not present any particular purpose, a waste of energy by a wasteful nature, a conclusion (not theirs) not difficult to draw and strangely in tune with early 19th and 20th century’s moralists’ represive attitude.
Far from helping, this kind of hypothesis merely demonstrates the limitation of a materialistic conception of evolution and natural selection. Other perversions such as pedophilia and incest show even less interest despite their widespread character, in primates and cetaceans and all the animal kingdom respectively.
Scientific considerations aside, we must acknowledge the reality that love today just isn’t what our aspirations crank it up to be, and has been fraud with deceptions and conflicts since the dawn of human history. More prosaically, tensions inevitably build up from intimacy and the best partners with the best personality imaginables, always end up bashing each other’s head against the wall out of frustration, sometimes literally.
We name those instinctive psychic backlashes
Excalibur impulses. Normally aimed at reestablishing balance in troubled inter-individual relationships, they often only cause further unrest, as said troubles unlike in nature are not merely accidental (a matter of
misunderstandings or singular
evil) but chemical, structural, hence bound to repeat themselves no matter what as long as the lifestyle itself has not been corrected.
Sexual alchemy is a myth, statistics showing the omnipresence of fake orgasms among heterosexual women, compared to homosexual ones. And what better evidence of a monumental faillure do we need to reconsider our whole approach ?
Some can try to persuade themselves (
I always fuck them well ). But men are easy to deceive, too in their dick’s narcissism. Studies show them blissfully unaware of when girls simulate or not.
- Top Fake Orgasm Statistics You Should Know
- 70% of women experience orgasms exclusively from clitoral stimulation.
- 13-14% of women have never had an orgasm or weren’t sure if they had.
- Women who made more money than their partners were twice as likely to fake orgasms than women who did not make more money than their partners.
42.4% of women faked orgasms because they didn’t want to hurt a partner’s feelings.
- A whopping 80% of women faked orgasms during vaginal intercourse.
- Women are 10 times more likely than men to say they only rarely reached their peak.
- FOD (Female Orgasmic Disorder), which results in the lack of orgasms, affects up to 28% of women in the United States and up to 46% in countries across Asia.
This elucidates the eagerness of giving into the G spot myth, that sacro-saint place of worship which could magically save coitus, the most single-minded and enduring obsession of humanity. Suddenly all the sour but accurate feminist complains of the 70s and 80s were promptly invalidated by an elusive G spot and the obsession of vaginal intercourse justified again even though said discovery hasn’t been replicated yet.
Men once again could forget about the clitoris.
This baffling disregard for their feminine partner and unwillingness to see the elephant in the room men routinely show, testifies not only to the ignorance of the much wider wealth of sexual contacts in nature, but also that there must be a common reason for that incompatibility in sex, which all cultures so far have show the signs of.
Children should be taught how their body works and how pleasure is obtained. This alone, would solve the issue of teen pregnancies, as basically for psychological health it matters not how orgasm pleasure is reached, but that it is indeed reached efficiently and often.
It is astoundingly, breath-takingly excruciating to see how today, most women are not and do not know how to be satisfied, hence living continuously unfulfilling lives… Which explains the age-old tendency in civilized societies, of women fantasizing about invaders and welcoming them in their bed. Like today’s feminists pinning for filthy swarthy Middle Easterners or Negroes. Or hundreds years ago, with Jewish or Muslim women eagerly going for Christians.
To us this incredible and irrational phenomena (for racial strangers fuck much worse than sensitive White men, quite systematically so) merely reflects the age-old longing for greener pastures, for exoticism, itself predicated on an unfulfilled desire which lies beyond the sex act itself (for men always also fantasized about foreigners from the West Indies in particular, and now Chinese and Japanese).
As long as sexuality doesn’t fulfill its most important role - that is to provide both orgasmic and metapsychic satisfaction - the race and the State will never be safe from the threat of racial contamination, stemming from within.
For centuries, under the terrifying, woefully oppressive yoke of the Catholic Church, people were more sexually free and happy than we are. They never forgot that pleasure comes mostly from the foreskin in the case of men, and only from the clitoris in the case of women. Sodomy might have been viewed as devilish, but it was practiced just as much according to the records, and without repercussion in most cases. They knew how to please themselves, be pleased and please others, and did so guilt-free.
Once young people know what to do and what to expect of a real love life, they will be free to seek their own happiness, and not be deceived or resign in accepting a miserable fate within the confines of a frustrating marital relation.
liberated heterosexual women who do take care of their orgasms, aren’t necessarily happy, nor they do find a sense of completion, drive and enthusiasm for life, any more than men do. Something is lacking in sex, regardless of the amount we get.
As for men, they quickly loose interest in a body they went in more than a few times and quickly enough needs more and more variety in lovemaking with ridiculous positions that change nothing, down to the grotesques range of sex-toys and degrading exposition of anatomical oddities porn movies are full of today. Logic also entails that the libido drive would automatically shut down when women are either to old to breed or visibly pregnant, or otherwise not objectively fertile, as is the case for nearly all animals save for the very same few that share our
Our mistake has always been to think reproduction was the
natural purpose of sexuality and merely diverted for egoistic pleasure, and while in our lineage (and a few others) it has always been the acquisition of a metapsychic energy fuelling psychic abilities.
That energy has various names in all cultures, but always has one, at least when such cultures hasn’t developped a paranoid fear of the supernatural as in countries of Christian, Muslim and Jewish faith. A term that sticked in anthropology, from studies of Melanesian and Polynesian, is that of
mana. We should accept the fact that “Primitives” more often than not, are and were no stupider than us, and much more rational in their worldview than us. And much readier to acknowledge what they don’t understand without flat-out denying its existence like modern zeteticians. While their science laged behind ours - obviously - relyong on the supernatural (for explanations or help) did not necessarily come as a clutch to supplement their loosy intellect.
Malinowski and Evans-Pritchard simply made the point that the Trobrianders and Azande lived in a more logical world than had theretofore been attributed toprimitives, but this still left room for magic and witchcraft as viable terms. Witchcraft of course is our word. Mangu is the Zande term for the substance found in a person’s body that gives that person the capacity for what we call witchcraft, and boro mangu is someone who possesses and uses this capacity.
This immaterial energy can only be produced with form of love that poets, philosophers (Plato the first) and ancient spiritual traditions of every past culture under the Sun described.
- The Etruscans (prevalent in Italy before the advent of Rome) were famous in antiquity for their complete absence of love taboos, as well as for their
manticians, true precognitives requiring no rituals.
- Persian priests were also renowned for their wisdom, both from their centuries-old habit of incestuous marriage over several generations.
- Although in an ever degrading, diminutive form, it still persisted in Europe until fairly recently, before the Industrial the Revolution2.
- Even today, the proportion of homosexuals or polygamists of all kinds among artists (music, cinema, fashion designers) far exceeds that of the ordinary public, and the most inspired/popular, the gayest, in a sort of concentric circle.
- Lastly, specialists in parapsychology know for a fact that
child molestationnearly always features in the childhood of
This almost universal mindset derives from the equally universal loss of dietary instincts brought about by the advent of food processing (starting with the cooking of food itself), inducing a paradoxicaland pathological brain wiring from day one.
According to stats, 92% of the population at large describes its practice as pure normalcy: Non-pedophilic, non-incestuous heterosexuality. While the norm for our closest cousins and many top-tier species regards to intelligence (cetaceans),is more than 70% of contacts being homosexual, which means that all individuals have on the regular contacts with both sex, and means a 100% bisexual population.
This huge discrepancy between homosexuality and heterosexuality, almost planetary, comes from this forceful rerouting of all polymorphic urges and libido into breeding behaviors, namely coitus.
There is no question about the blatant excess of heterosexuality in our species due to exciting substances, first and foremost denatured molecules, aka cooking. Decades of observations showed the significant direct effect of cooking in ramping up animal baser animal impulses, among them heterosexual desire in particular coital fantasies.
The reason being these fantasies are not merely acquired conditioning but instinctive impulses recorded in the deepest depths of our brain and DNA and appeared along our phylogenetic line before homosexual (or polymorphic in general, which includes anything without immediate procreative purpose) instincts developed.
The precise nature of our sexual issues, at least the most urgent one, lies in people seeking happiness in such distorted impulses, and romanticizing, idealizing them, in the end which leads to the model of harems or nuclear families while only 3-5% of all species of mammals that are monogamous, and hardly any of them actually live in truly
faithful couples. And all those do also feature infidelities by both partners, females included.
This phenomena is an immediate consequence of denatured molecules acting on the brain generating an excessive attraction to all traits (inner or outer) in a partner that are innately associated with the breeding scheme.
From a male perspective, this means a hard-on for symbols of fertility (big booty) or the female submissiveness to her
It also stacks up with time, creating a paradoxal heterosexual structure we then automatically believe to be natural and not learned. We get used to these unnatural urges to fuck (for men) or breed (mostly for girls, since early childhood causing things like the fixation on dolls) creating in every person growing up under the influence of cooking whole personality traits at odds with our instinctive programming.
On top of that, the Oedipus complex of which we talk below intervenes, building up on that accumulating exacerbated libido, cementing the fixation on maternal figures. Something similar happens with women too but less so, making for a blurrier limit between love and friendships among women. As diet only worsened in the long run (because of the lack of rationalism and formalization of the issue), culture could only stray further and further away.
Degenerate Amerimutts (or niggers) jacking off to the worse porn for years, while drinking beverages probably less healthy as acid battery at this point, biologically lost the cerebral sensibility for metasexuality the same way epileptics can not play the violin.
The Key to real Magic
The real novelty of Guyclaude Burger’s, is the reproducibility of these phenomena under a raw diet, pointing at paranormal abilities an innate genetic potential for all humans, racial differences aside.
We do not make the claim that psychic abilities are real… others already won this battle on the scientific ground, with numerous evidences. For all intent and purpose the Psi makes no statistical doubt anymore, and the real reason of their rejection by the public and most scientists alike must rather lie in the content and assumptions of our culture, and the kind of minds they engender. The IMI claims study the paranormal, not to not believe in it.
But this, is to go even further beyond !
More than five consecutive decades of observations showed that a free exercise of what Freud called
polymorphisms - anything not seen in human and apes and outside coitus constitute the perfect conditions an advanced and eerily precise form of clairvoyance, in which it sufficed to merely ask questions, any question, and see the reply in a visual sense… sometimes hear it. These facts are nothing new in history: such relationships or disinhibited love in general (which does include cases of heterosexuality) were often labelled as being the source of magic, witchcraft, divine inspirations, with extreme regularity. European Middle-Age, Ancient Egypt, Greek-Roman civilization, Celts, the whole of Asia.
Theorizing occurred very spontaneously, with observations in a hitherto unknown dietary context that could be calledpreculinary referential. The radical change in eating habits and elimination of all the stimulants present in common foods: gluten (cereals), exorphins (milk), caffeine, theobromine (chocolate), alcohol, AGE etc., made possible wholly unprecedented observations under cooking’s rule. Those taking part in this unusual experience saw their sexual excitability change dramatically. It was thus possible to bring out what can be called the natural laws of human sexuality and to highlight unknown - or generally hidden - relationships between amorous behavior and the development of extrasensory faculties.
Ranging from repairing complex electronic devices by seeing the single transistor needing replacement, or divining the exact place of turtle eggs in three coordinates - longitudinal, latitudinal distance plus depth - in a vast sand beach, foretelling up to the decimal the exact selling figure to predict the year’s budget in an import company, or obtaining precise on several months of someone’s life several thousand kilometers away.
While extremely impressive the required conditions explain why these things are so rare today even in seemingly
correct relationships. The extrasensory requires a very calm nervous system, undisturbed by cooking-related excitants, and so, maintaining dietary discipline to a T over the years, a feat few over the time have proved capable of.
To realize one is subject to feedback (not thinking straight and taking everything out of proportion) from within is close to impossible. It requires a strong dose of metacognition (seeing oneself thinking, from above) and the memory of previous mental states, a facet of intelligence rather dismissed by our culture obsessed with facts and action and filling our minds rather than knowing them…
Years of instincto make it easier (relatively speaking), but there is still a difference between recognizing it after the fact, on the spot, and being able to change something about it at the very moment.
The self-increasing cacophony of thoughts not kept in checked anymore by natural regulations (by reality) leads to madness and mental exhaustion. Usually asking others if we behave in a disturbed (read: annoying) way is the surest way to know, much like in Naturo the way we get out of a genjutsu by getting teammates to inject chakra in our system.
In the biblical sense, the processing of food (especially with heat) has caused the
Fall of our culture, and this Fall is reproduced in all relationships, at all orgasms in the wrong places, at the wrong times and with the wrong psychic position. It is reproduced at every puberty.
Sexual activities being mainly driven by coarse chaotic impulses, we do not know how to properly make love, nor do we usually care or wish to learn it: years of (insufficient) education or feminist efforts in
progressive Western countries to highlight this perpetual issue of men’s just wanting to cum, convinced of their all-mighty virile member’s divine power to give pleasure to women.
Since cooking and later the Neolithic Revolution with the advent of agriculture cerebral disturbances have increased steadily, warping our very psychic functioning further and further from the mental and emotional balance, the state of inner harmony everyone should be capable of, and that characterized wild animals in absence of stress. On the opposite feedback induces the neurologic tendency to repeat mental patterns from ideas to behaviors, by feeding cerebral centers the product of their own processing, drifting further and further from the original signal, be it a physical stimulus or the first impression. Like a micro and speaker in the Larsen effect.
All mental issues ranging from slight imperfections to typical cases in madhouses (with the exceptions of known genetic or otherwise biological aberrations or developmental troubles) fall naturally into one or more of the three categories of neurosis, schizoid dissociation and paranoïa (synonymous with psychosis).
The correction of food hygiene, in the sense of a diet closer to the genetic data of the metabolism, favors the relaxation of the central nervous system, the release of censorship, fixations, and internal tensions in general. As we will see later, the use of natural raw foods can also have an impact on paranoid tendencies and facilitate the abandonment of cleavages and stereotypes, thus facilitating a restructuring.
The definition of the natural raw norm created a powerful theoretical framework with the unintended consequence of describing all behaviors by the same few categories, akin to physics’ field equations or Theory Of Everything. Once the essence of reality has been understood, accurate models then flow flawlessly without the need for ad-hoc corrections years after years.
In our case, it appeared that all behaviors pathological or not and their deviation toward the natural state (the acceptance of reality - interior and exterior - and knowing precisely where mental projections and the world meet or separate) are modelized by three parameters and one absolutely revolutionary overarching heuristics, making sense of everything else.
The following is an introduction to the technicalities associated with metapsychoanalysis:
This denotes the ability to put a desire or wish on hold and invest the emotional energy (
libido) elsewhere. It is essential for animals to learn to delay the satisfaction or expression of instincts until the context is right, depending on the environment, physical or social. All animals can do it to some degree, while obviously the bigger the brain the higher the capacity for metacognition and rationalization and thus, for investing that resources, psychic or physical, toward not the specific outcome desired, but the proximate steps toward a later but ultimately more desirable fulfillment of some kind for that instinct. We do not blindly give in to impulses and the urge for immediate gratification, to favor a better future as our intellect predicts. No more
muh diik nigga.
This natural attribute becomes neurosis and pathological, when the unconsciously internalized result of a repressive parental upbringing (or similar conditionings) takes the place of conscious rational motives, deviating or perverting that drive toward socially desirable outcomes leaving said desires unfulfilled and the individual unknowingly frustrated.
But since typically sexual desires are all aimed at energy and metapsychic ends, they are not offset easily and frustration pents up, ordering all that nervous energy to go somewhere, twisting the personality in increasingly worse ways as years go by. Broadly speaking, unconscious neurosis (almost a tautology) is to current people’s mind, what the conscious rational and conditional postponing of behaviors waiting for a favorable context, was to the natural mind. Feedback doesn’t play a big role here, but crank up the next component (paranoia) up to eleven, which then amplifies the frustration and compulsions resulting from neurosis.
Paranoia, is the tendency to
believe in oneself, regardless of evidence, experiences and rational conclusions. It is also the
egoof Eastern philosophies while the psychoanalytic notion of
I(often translated in the Latin
Ego) rather equals the
Self, the neutral sense of identity.
This understanding of paranoia is specific to Burger’s metapsychoanalysis, and reflects the long experience of comparing - often in the same person - the natural state and one under feedback. Paranoia is the belief in one’s self-righteousness and refusal to acknowledge sensory reality.
Per se, it is not
unnatural, but positively needed as in any context we never possess the full information needed to reach logical certainty for anything. For any question and endeavor, an amount of choice and belief or convincing is present. The very nature of the material world, makes some level of ego indispensable, even animals need to try at things (hunting preys, courting mates, challenging males) with a modicum of hope that it might succeed, especially when the risks involved or resources invested are significant. A
purely logicalassessment or choice which would always be correct, would require total information, which is never available. And this assumes the universe is deterministic, but quantum physics hints at probabilistic universe, with unlikely occurrences of disproportionate effects (
Black Swans) never ruled out. But when and where they happen, is inherently imprevisible through measurement.
The existence of extra-sensory perception does not allow for an categorically deterministic universe either, as spiritual informations always carry emotions and symbols, in our experience they rather broaden the range of possible outcomes, not limit them to
the one written to happen.In fact, once can argue the extrasensory should fuel to the ego: a healthy ego should derive its self-confidence from divine inspiration, not from whatever inflated sense of prideful infallibility.
Trust in destiny against all odds should be to a healthy spirit what ego, what paranoia or narcissism (all the same) are to most.
Ego can be labeled as pathological whenever it outgrows any useful purpose despite clear evidence that our initial bet or stance fails to deliver and we should rather change our mind. Just like men cannot imagine their penis is not the end-all-be-all, sole purveyor of bliss for the woman.
It is more or less with the term
psychosis, traditionally explained as the projection of one’s inner content or desire into reality. Still traditionally, one CAN be made aware of a neurosis and the internal complex leading to a dysfunctional behavior, while a psychotic can not, as the inner source of his disorder is not accessible to his conscious.
To be precise, one could convince intellectually a psychotic that one’s explanation is logical and the cause does not lie outside - someone being a reincarnation of Napoleon the First) but inside - the belief and desire of being Napoleon. But the psychotic will still have the very same impression, perceiving this reality as surely as he perceives his own mind.
It is said that curing psychosis is not possible, but we observed differently: paranoia tends to dwindle and we becomes able to see the world how it really appears (and maybe make a conscious choice to do otherwise, a healthy bet on an hypothetical but not impossible outcome). We become capable to see certitudes not as unconditional exterior facts, but simply as beliefs, inner content we give more or less credit.
We ascribe the egotic structuring of the self - primary narcissism and all paranoid, obsessive tendencies - to the early exposition of cooked food:
The alimentary origin of a primary paranoia, attributable to a defective learning of the alliesthetic variations of the gustatory pleasure in the culinary context and hypothecating the oedipal period through the overinvestment of the precocious impulses.
The idea is simple: raw food constantly changes from time to time, from terrible or downright painful, to bland or heavenly. Strawberries do not taste like strawberries, we discover a whole range of interesting variations, a true tapestry or symphony of tastes. Learning this reality very early (as a baby) when we barely start dissociating oneself from the outside world, has the effect of cementing an open minded attitude which sees expectations or hopes as anything but certain, while simply heeding one’s senses of tastes and smell registers as the surest way to get pleasure, bliss, happiness. We learn to trust reality and mold our desires onto it, not to expect it to match our desires and lashing out when they inevitably don’t.
On the other hand starting life with cooked food, whose taste is linear and always the same for a given food, does not lend itself to open mindedness, rather the opposite, to a assumption of control: we learn that things are what we expect them to be, and our happiness or sense of identity relies on our ability to predict them. We develop an obsession with knowing and controlling outcomes, and enter a state of wilful denial when it fails, refusing to accept facts.
This was for cooking’s role in the early psychic structure. But it also amps up the innate brain tendency to confuse one’s intellectual (or emotional) projections with reality itself, giving them an undue level of certitude and potency: this ties to the very definition of the feedback phenomena, which sees the brain feeding of its own output in a retroactive feedback look, and said projections getting way out of hand, out of sync with sensory (or extrasensory !) inputs. In practice, this makes
regularpeople eating traditional obnoxious and cocky, exceedingly difficult to tell apart delusions and extricate emotional attachment
from facts. Up to a certain point, one can still exert metacognition to see the truth but past it, we enter the psychiatric area.
This point, still, varies from case to case and person to person, each society labeling
crazya different spectrum of personalities. Conversely, different kinds of crazy obsessions are deemed
normal(meaning, not perceived at all !), part of
Neurosis and paranoia do not contradict or exclude each other, as we said, they all stem from essential mind properties. So in any given case, both are bound to figure in some shape or form, to varying degrees, according to what model seems most fitting, how strongly invested the delusion is and how much capacity for metacognition the person keeps.
Splitting or schizoid dissociative tendencies
The third parameter is perhaps the most difficult to understand, unless one has had personal experience with it, as it is the least accessible to consciousness, actually touching the very consciousness itself in its physical/cerebral aspect, not its content.
Splitting is a term used in psychiatry to describe the inability to hold or consider equally contradictory feelings or beliefs. It is the mind’s tendency to lose unity and fragment: to forget or not keep track of what it does or thought, a phenomenon which ends up in the classic case of
multiple personalities. However usually schizoid tendencies don’t go nearly that far, more broadly it carries the meaning of bearing contradictory thoughts or reasonings at the same time, without being aware or making sense of it, as if separate minds were vying for attention beyond our control, causing an increasing state of groundless anxiety Definition: State of persistent fear or anxiety, devoid of identifiable object or motive, be it physical emotional or mental, and thus, inaccessible to analysis. often causing a spiral of further fragmentation or compartimentalization as a defense mechanism, relegating the painful feelings to the background, or to separate persona in order to alleviate consciousness in other moments.
It has been proved to associate time and time again, with cereals, gluten in particular, hence with wheat in particular:
The likelihood that wheat gluten is a true pathogenic factor is further suggested by reports on the psychiatric characteristics of celiac patients who are known to be intolerant to wheat gluten and its analogs (15). These patients have been characterized as being turned inward, difficult in temperament, negativistic, schizoid, paranoid, rigid and stereotyped, and repetitious in behavior.
More importantly, it has been noted that these personality features tend to differentiate the celiacs from patients with other disorders associated with malabsorption and malnutrition, such as cystic fibrosis and ulcerative colitis.
A recent ethological study has shown that celiacs resemble psychotic patients in showing increased “flight” and decreased “play” behavior (16); these behaviors diminished when gluten was eliminated from their diet.
In susceptible individuals, therefore, wheat gluten per se seems able to produce schizoid changes in personality.
Momentarily being of
multiple minds, withholding judgment but holding all in consideration like a Bose-Einstein condensate in quantum superposition unwilling to settle on one particular state, is - like for neurosis and paranoia - not problematic per se. As psychiatric terms, in some way paranoia and schizophrenia are polar opposite of each other, as while the first can be summarized as the incapacity to withdraw a decision or from taking any, the second is the incapacity to deal with decisions on a cognitive level.
Refraining from choosing immediately the most logical (as a man would) or emotionally pleasant (as women tend to do) decisions and ignoring the others is necessary evolutionary feature: all animals need the flexibility to cope with an unpredictable natural world. For the same reason we also need the laser-like focused intelligence of paranoia, we need the mirror-like intelligence to represent things as they are without altering or
improvingon the bare result of our perception, while keeping an underlying sense of Self of identity. We need the capacity to withdraw from further action without giving in to the compulsion to reject or act on drives based on clearly limited knowledge, or demonstrably irrational or too fleeting emotions.
Proper dissociation happens when we stop perceiving mental contents that don’t mesh together, and as time goes more or more that content loses connection with itself and the rest, until the perception of both the Self and reality crumble and we can’t make sense of anything anymore.
To simplify things, in order to get back some stability, the reaction to an undesirable pulsion can be neurosis (burying the original unadulterated fantasies under the weight of more palatable, fake ones), psychosis or paranoia (easing tension by projecting ideas on the outside world or sometimes identifying to it) and lastly dissociation, by eliminating it completely.
Though the book does elaborate on likely psychological causes fuelling dissociation or cleavage, it is a cognitive problem directly induced by denatured molecules disturbing the brain’s functions and natural harmony, destabilizing the mind. With years and traumatic experiences (which as we will see, have proven to be the norm in a Western upbringing, not the exception) this creates a schizoid mode of functioning, in which troublesome contents are stopped from making spreading discontent and unease by disappearing from sight and the effort required to make sense of an outside world difficult to understand and rather hostile, gradually discarded.
As such, while neurosis can be induced in animals with high enough stress, the levels of dissociation we see in society do not seem possible to induce in someone who grew up under raw food.
The drive or desire (having wild barebone doggy-style sex with your mother!) still exists, its energy is not disinvested, removed from the mind, but we loose track of it, a part of the mind itself becomes out of reach, left to rot and fragment further. The stronger the forclosed complexe/instinct, the more and faster the mind unravels, hence the most dire cases of schizophrenia often relate to childhood conflicts linked to love and guilt, carrying an existential weight unlike any other.
The defining characteristic of metapsychoanalysis is not merely the refinement of old psychoanalytic concepts nor the traumatizing realization nearly all humanity is rendered insane on a molecular level.
What could truly unwind the essence of human behaviors across the millenia, is the discovery of two separate instinctive programs regulating romantic and sexual appeals, one pertaining to spiritually fecund relationships (by far the dominant one since the bonobo) the other aimed at reproduction.
The purpose of primitive animals is to reproduce while a handful of mammals evolved intimacy as a means to enhance consciousness (as Plato elucidated) through the exchange of metasexual energy, ultimately ensuring the indefinite existence of the species in the future.
- Paradigms of the cross-drive induction theory:
- As the metapsychic program evolved on an animal basis, nearly all instincts and associated fantasies in one program have a direct analogue in the other.
- There is since the Neolithic a biological impossibility to fulfil our subtle metasexual erotic needs for energy as the flooding of denatured molecules exaggerates the most primitive sexual urges, which focuses on breeding.
- But as the metasexual drive can not disappear (overpowering in importance even the survival instinct hence the possibility of suicides), what we observe in pathological minds the systematic transfer of investment from metasexual partial drives to their reproductional equivalents the closest in mental fantasies.
Plato expressly points at a common aspiration of immortality of the programs, be it of the body or the soul, and the fact most, without the necessary initiation, easily confuse the two. That methodology produced a total classification of the content of any human production, from individual behaviors to vast historical movements, according to which instincts they express from either programs, and what twisting they underwent, under the effect of which causes3.
Clearly distinct from the now prevalent or publically aclaimed effeminate homosexuals transsexuals and other psychiatric abominations, have always stood the relationships practiced by the highest geniuses and warriors, the likes of Plato, Michelangelo, Achilles and Patroclus, Eugene of Savoy, Lord Byron, Goethe, Edgar Allan Poe, Casanova, Gajdusek, Sapho, Michael Ange…
Criteria for Metasexual Relationships
Talking from experience, the most striking aspect of a relationship loaded with energy, is the constant feeling of consciousness expansion. It seems like the other person is part of ourselves, as if our consciousness extended to it, and more. Obviously this impression is at its peak when we make love, for metasexuality is the evolutionary co-opting by evolution of the intense contact of mucosa and exchange of fluids occuring with sexuality, as physical vectors of energy.4
Everything we see looks different, richer in tone, hues and shape, carrying yet unforeseen meanings we can’t quite pinpoint or label with words. As if reminding us of things we had forgotten until then. The world is transfigurated. Songs like Every Little Thing She Does Is Magic or Rosanna explore that state although usually (read: in the culinary referential) it can only be attained sporadically, in rare spurts only frustrating even more that no technique can latch onto.
This state of consciousness is the hallmark of the metapsychic program, whose very purpose is the expansion of consciousness. Sex itself, is transfigurated. Sensations are much more powerful, they last longer, and keep you satisfied for the whole day (or several) on both the organic level and metapsychic or spiritual level. The mere remembrance of magical liaison can sustain us for long periods of erotic starvation, as it did with Guy-Claude in prison.
It is not about reaching orgasm anymore (though it does come eventually, in all its mind-blowing glory), our mind can breath and focus on subtle sensations or not focusing at all, just
letting go. My point is, there is no need to
think anymore, things just happen on their own, bodies move on their accords, fantasies pop up at the right moment, with little to no words to be uttered.
Having multiple partners is very much appreciated, but not as a way to cope with boredom. We understand love as an exchange of consciousness-information, hence more partners can mean more knowledge, but only in the right state of mind, in the right energetic circumstances. In those circumstances we learn to talk directly and receive its answers through visions.
But on the other hand:
Because the purpose of our existence is spiritual, because we are wired for metasexuality, behaving like cows and roosters, spending our time breeding and raising kids as a means to an end like any inferior animal does (instead of an extension or a function of energy, to increase beauty or consciousness on Earth and enact destiny) actively depletes our energy level, with depression as a result. Indeed depression is not a chemical brain imbalance but the feeling of an inner lack, the lack of the literal soul stuff, which hurts more deeply than any food shortage, especially when no one has any clue about the causes.
Roosters do not suffer from chasing females half of the day, because Nature wills it… For that reason their ridiculous prideful character doesn’t feel off nor dysfunctional.
In the elated state of consciousness metasexuality aims at and induces, all notions such as age or sex are discarded, only beauty - inner and outer - matters, and the burning need make the world a better life, expressing the eternal archetypal Essences we are both drawing from and drawn to. I can assert from both theory and experience, that the biggest problem - beside cooking - which makes those relationships very difficult to maintain, is the constant inner work they require, lest energy and the mindboggling sex to gradually disappear, as resentment and enmity settle.
Whenever things get sour between two people who until thenWhile the outcome might be the same - the disparition of love - whenever that happens, one should wonder: was the relationship itself false from the beginning, based either on parental projections ?
Or did it come from personal mistakes blocking the flow of energy ?
In that case can we do something constructive which wouldn’t amount to a cop-out or lying to ourselves ?
Such questions require a case by case inquiry with the theory’s formalism merely here to assist, compensating for a personal experience that living in a culture fully in line with instincts should impart from an early age.
A Case for Sodomy
Natural Lubrication and Cooking
The anatomical disparity between bonobos and humans quite significant: the sexual dimorphy is lesser so compared to chimpanzees males are relatively smaller and females taller, while penises are smaller and clitoris huge, so much so that clitoral penetration has been observed !
Penile sodomy is impossible to them, and overall the most frequent contact is genital-genital rubbing (dry humping or tribadism for lesbians, while it lacks a name when it involves a penis). But male homosexuals are mostly unanimous as to what contact provides the stronger pleasure, by miles: passive sodomy.
In essence this issue is not limited to gays or male homos. Though bonobos do show a great deal of our erotic genetic norm, what we should aspire to and express if not for induced sexual repression (and endogenous inhibitions due to cooking), on the other hand it seems like we did improve on them, a lot.
We became much more attune to energy, much more capable to feel it, internalize and metabolize it: the evolution toward complexity of consciousness started with apes, continued within our own lineage, with some failures and successes along the way, in the form of the various phenotypes/species either continuously improving on themselves, mixing out, erased by others or failing to adapt to climate changes. Though we currently fill them with shit our big brains theoretically allow for an expanded consciousness richer in experience than anything a primate’s could host.
The most obvious anatomical change associated with such a heightened metapsychical metabolism (beside brain size) that our theory can explain, is our much improved ability for passive sodomy.
People who unlocked it fully, be them men or women, can lubricate very quickly, better than most vaginas can boast of. This very fact is still ignored (or flat out rejected in a self-justification lashing-out) by
authorities in the matter, even the most disgustingly liberal ones:
Before I slide down this particular pole, let me reveal a bias: I am a firm believer that lube makes any sexual activity much more pleasurable. The wetter and slipperier everything is, the better. But lubricant is not just desirable; it’s essential to any anal penetration. Unlike the vagina, the anus and rectum are not self-lubricating.
During anal exploration of yourself or a partner, you might find that the anus feels wet. What you’re feeling is a natural mucous secretion from the anal canal and maybe some sweat—but neither this nor spit provides enough wetness to do the trick. Beyond sneaking a finger a millimeter inside someone’s ass, you need lube.
We find the same discourse from a rabid retarded Christian:
Finally, the human sexual body itself reflects what is natural, the tradition taught. A penis can slide into a vagina easily and comfortably during love-making, while anal penetration requires artificial lubrication and often causes pain.
Which is remarkably wrong on all accounts. There exists a distinct anal lubrication, which might even make adjunction of saliva unnecessary.
Specialized glands exist called anal glands, whose original function is to ensure adequate lubrication during excretion at the end of the tube: the glands of Hermann and Fossé5. They also produce odoriferous substances marking a male’s territory. It also helps the natural inner cleaning of the anus and rectum.6
Those same glands must have been repurposed since our separation from chimpanzees (at least some good 9 millions years ago) in order to support penile sodomy all the way. Under good psychological conditions an individual can excrete an ungodly amount of such lubricant - enough to visibly grease buttocks - with little to no stimulation, reliably.
The fact the majority of people (not even of homosexuals) can not boast of such a feat, is easy to account for, not contradicting the theory one bit. Vaginas lubricate better in most circumstances because of the following:
- Vagina are meant (mainly) for reproduction from the moment of the first periods, hence its lubrication is under control of the same chaotic breeding instincts amplified by dietary feedback. As there are reasons to believe in an excessive fertility on a physiological and hormonal level, women could logically lubricate too easily, when neither energy nor the need or desire to make a baby arise, as an automatic response to a situation evocative of breeding. In other words, in presence of a triggering pattern specific to the breeding instinctive program.
- This program, being more animalistic in nature, activates much more easily that’s why it has to be actively (though spontaneously) restrained and corralled into more civilized and transcendent goals, sublimated, as Freud would have. Hence under extreme existential frustration and confusion of programs (akin to a BIOS corruption in a computer more than a simple OS bug), mating mechanisms would logically run amok7.
On the other hand the three natural sources of lubricants necessary for a seemless sodomy totally depend on rather strict metasexual requirements, automatically ruling out it working in presence of feedback-induced endogenous stress or excitation.
These three sources are:
- Penises do produce a coat of lubricant (called Cowper’s fluid or vulgarly precum), an excellent one, which nevertheless only answers to very important desires often of the metasexual kind such as age gap. For the same reason it can’t be forced either, and often lack in intercourses.
- Saliva is also an abundant source: but not just any saliva like the one involved in the early oral phase of digestion. While it lacks an official recognition, there is a distinct kind of fat viscous saliva excreted on command by the mouth’s many glands (abundantly so).
- Anal lubrication proper5.
This biological ability, by far the most important for a pleasurable penetration, is also by far the most sensitive. Normally developped during the anal stage before 6 through the mother’s care (licking and fingering, as observed universally with Primitives), developing later in life is challending, even under raw conditions
All instincts need actualizing and it is theorized that the key moment for learning ensuring a normal healthy structuring regards to anal sensibility (later on proper sodomy) occurs early on between 0 and 4 (or 6) years old, when the mother should routinely caress and pleasure with her fingers and tongue our lovely butthole up to and including gentle penetrations, as the annals of ethnology relate, both for practical purpose and energy.
While being it should be as ordinary and intuitive as learning how to walk or talk, it appears extraordinary only because it’s lacking in our model of education. And as for walking or talking, learning how to love requires the active involvement of adults, of a functional society let a dire deficiency to take place and be extremely difficult - though not impossible - overcome afterward.
For someone who did not grow his sensibility in due time nor endeavoured to compensate afterward with conscious efforts, any attempt at penetration, even with fingers, will be met with the anus clamping extremely strongly, beside the absence of lubrification, leading most gays (let alone heterosexuals) to resort to lube.
This mere biological incompability (at least statistically) between sophisticated cooking and even the physical components of metasexuality, is the main reason behind the rarity of natural sodomy today, even for people who actually enjoy it.
One the other hand, with enough training and exposition to the correct sexual situations as well as the proper attitude, even very late (as Guy-Claude Burger could attest) it works well.
The Smell Argument
bad smell or
unclean argument against sodomy has a bit more truth to it, but doesn’t really stand up to close scrutiny either. Bad smells from feces do not exist in nature: wild animals’ stools do not smell at all and those of instincto babies neither. Healthy rectums are self-cleaning. Those odors come from systematically bad digestive processes, which otherwise would be as transparent as any organ in the body we are not supposed to think about nor can control consciously.
Elimination of denatured molecules in instincto and/or consecutively to viral episodes, also induces the expulsion of such
fragrant bouquets: what goes in by error, goes out by design, or we wouldn’t live nearly as long as we do… It also means different persons will stink more or less depending on their diet and overall health. Different cultures or the same at different points in time will vary for the same reasons, as per all pathological processes.
accidents of a coprologic nature even without raw food are actually as uncommon as easy to avoid, pointing at bad smell and faeces rather acting as both a symbols for that disgust of anality and a convenient excuse, masking for our peace of mind the true unconscious irrational motives.
Beside, many vaginas also famously smell bad, proportionally to their owner’s bad diet. Yet this doesn’t discourage heterosexual men from shoving their dick in them.
We believe that increasingly complex cooking induced a world-wide tendency not only to reject sodomy on a conscious level, but more importantly it radically hinders or stop altogether, the natural tendency to lick infants to clean them, like do all mammals.
Harder Is Not Better
The selective pressure of metasexual energy processing might possibly explain the loss of our baculum, which is a bone present in the penis making it rigid at all time… yes, always hard. Most mammals have it, others don’t, and while all primates have it, men lost all of it. We don’t understand these fast and extremely frequent changes (Evidence suggests that the baculum was independently evolved 9 times and lost in 10 separate lineages) as evidenced by the nonsensical opinions:
A bone in the penis allows a male to mate for a long time with a female, which can be a distinct advantage in some mating strategies. The length of the baculum may be related to the duration of copulation in some species
Except that… individual human copulations figure among the longest in the animal kingdom hands down. More likely usually chance genetic drift have a lot to do with this. But In humans, the rigidity of the erection is provided entirely through blood pressure in the corpora cavernosa and I don’t think anyone has to complain… In any case our inborn expectations for performance would necessarily match our capabilities.
But on the other hand, being steel-hard is useless. On the contrary penile flexible softness adds a great deal to the variety of sensation, and adapt our sacro-sainct glorious penis to a wealth of locations and touchings, whose exquisiteness might actually exceed bonobos’. Hands, butts, mouth, armpits, from any direction, you name it. Only true humans could take from a chaotic child game in apes to a true symphony of magical accords.
Now that we saw the reasons our visceral disgust for sodomy, we should wonder: How enjoyable is it ?
The anus is packed with nerves, especially the incredibly erogenous pudendal nerve—which connects to the clitoris. The pudendal nerve carries sensation to and from your perineum, reaching your vagina, vulva, and anus, too.
Some women describe it as being similar to a clitoral orgasm—a pulse of pleasurable contractions, but this time around the anal sphincter. Others may feel more of aspreading waveof pleasure.
I surveyed 2,110 women, of all orientations, on whether they’ve had an anal orgasm or not. 28.4% of women have had at least one anal orgasm, which means they are certainly possible, but most women have not yet had one.
It was an intense sensation like a clitoral orgasm but like ten times more intense. ya know like Mount Saint Helen just blew a wad. He was pounding me deep, hard, and fast and as he got more excited, I got more excited and we came at the same time.
The feeling lasted longer than clitoral/vaginal orgasms. I kept moaning even after he was out of me. It was amazing, it is more powerful than a vaginal orgasm. The anal area is so much more sensitive than the vagina it feels like. So the sensation was on many levels a very titillating experience. Different in an up my spine sensation.
It was combined with clitoral but was way more intense than vaginal combined with clitoral. Could come more easily than with vaginal.
While the descriptions vary and may sound rather exaggerated or outright fabricated, from my own experience I know it is - can be - at least extremely pleasant for women while for men it is the strongest physical experience, usually way above isolated front orgasm in comparison coming up short in relief, power and duration, by miles. This, is something 95% of heterosexual men fully ignore, a fact which statistically necesarily bears the most far-reaching consequences. According to Ancient Greeks, passivity (synonymous with pedication) not only wasn’t infamous, but it was thought that boys loved by elders make for the most virile warriors and statesmen.
Anality rose as the primary and most advanced exchange of energy, and the intensity, ease of access and wealth of sensation it brings match its metapsychical importance.
Solutions for Modern Problems
The Mistake of Monogamy
science and common wisdom concur that monogamy is the natural form of matings with the justification that fidelity and repetition solidify the home, creating a stable environment for the offspring and take advantage of the largest window of fertility before one or the other partner has his or her menopause or the equivalent to make as many children as possible (same age. Love is basically nature luring you with the pleasure of sex, to trick you in the hassle and enormous personal investment of procreation.
But that concept is widely contradicted by the animal world: closing the horizon of partners is illogical and lo and behold, in the majority of monogamous species, adultery is the norm. Settling on one partner precludes seeking the best genes in the interest of the offspring. While most inferior species, concerned only with basic reproduction, do not form lasting bonds between genitors beyond the short time it takes for younglings to reach maturity.
primitive cultures the notion of faithful couples and sexual exclusivity do not exist. Their social norms (and good diet, at least in some aspects) manage to reduce jealousy, to the point that in some cases young girls are taught to ride a high number of partners (according to Malinowksi,
bathing in semen !). Exclusivity is the deat of passion, love and desire. History is full of men mistreating unfaithful women horribly while they gave themselves the right to fuck any random hoe. To the extreme, men’ over-reaction is beyond unimaginable in cruelty, including from the falsely called
There are two major causes of jealousy, possessiveness.
At puberty heterosexuality becomes definitive for 90% of the population and takes on its
procreative orientation… because a non-procreative heterosexuality is totally possible, as we will see. The metasexual program does not include this kind of strict sexual polarity: in particular the representation of coitus only kicks in at puberty. A sexuality centered on energy would be as if blind to gender and age differences. Simply put, orgasms and butts have no gender, do they.
In nature, the infant would bath in energy from both the father and the mother, or at least people of both sex their parents or not. Instead the baby is frustrated from day one, and whenever his mind matured enough to separate himself from his mother, he also begets the category of
the Other, the archetypal
But a hypothetical situation where the father would willingly leave the child alone to sleep with the mother there wouldn’t be much of a solution either: it’s more complicated. An absentee father is better than a castrating or violent one, but in the end but does not provide energy either.
And since touching children - even our own - in any way that could provide them some erotic gratification has been progressively outlawed and vilified to the extreme, the possibility for them to feel what they should or do in nature, has become utterly impossible.
Due to this lack of real love, the unbelievable trauma of a sexless childhood leave every single person a permanent scare, whether we want it or not, just like malnutrition causes permanent growth issues that never fully heal afterwards.
Most of us become soulless golems, easy to manipulate and order around by an equally soulless but more malignant elite.
Freud had at first ascribed the castration complex (feeling of inferiority and groundless anxiety linked to sex) under the (admittedly detestable) practice of threatening boys with cutting their dick off to make them obey. Then realized the complex (sex-related feeling of anxiety or guilt) was just as present when parents did not employ these methods.
Typically, as the mother is too absorbed in her suffering within her marital relationship, she has nothing to give and quickly enough the baby resents the father as the responsible, often rightfully so. Freud described the jealousy of fathers toward their infant children, monopolizing the mother and so hindering men’ access to sex. Because we are talking of babies or infants that do not think rationally, as a consequence all strangers to that primordial fusion with the mother, are categorized as enemies or thieves.
Hence we quickly learn it is impossible to love several people at the same time. We learn to think in exclusionary, binary terms. Only ever one person at a time. A winner implies a looser. A way of thinking christened as the
2-1 mode, while opening up to opening to more people coincides with more happiness, not less.
Then arrives the chemical factor which we illustrated with the Hottentot Venus. In general, feedback overstimulates the grossest, oldest impulse centers of the brain, which in love corresponds to reproduction, of which jealousy is a part, as the obvious drive to chase away male concurrents to maximize one’s offspring.
What we call
desire, is today society most of the time wholly disconnected from love. Purely physical, this kind of drive is indeed unnatural, and is part of the IRP (instinctive reproductive program), but in a deregulated way. The phase all boys go through, during which they have to fight with their desire to penetrate anything that reminds them of the
three points (two breasts, one vagina) kinda exists in nature but it happens here on steroids.
Women also have vaginal and reproductive urges that they invest similarly from puberty, but the hormonal difference very often makes our male urges more
aggressive… proactive. Even if cultural perception has something to do with it. So we get people driven to find love, but whose endeavour only brings boredom and irritation. And if the men are not satisfied, they can find a little pleasure, more or less addictive when they have more than that. In terms of
sensitivity the woman’s glans is on her clitoris, and orgasm is the exception not the rule. To be honest, I think that 95% of women simulate, the rest being lesbians, or taking care of themselves.
Hormonal imbalances cause this kind of deregulation and also induce the adolescence spurt which no other species show, but it only takes on a totipotent and irresistible aspectin response to all the pent-up frustration the boy has kept inside him for years as a child, because of the prohibition of adult-children relationships, or even without laws the simple inability of the average adult to respond to the child accordingly, if at all. If I know for fact sexual play wasn’t uncommon yet 40 years ago, it is no longer the case. The
latency period seems much more real to me than it did in Freud’s time…
- The role of hormones in adolescent excitation
- It is often said that
hormonestakes over adolescents. This is both right and wrong. It is right that the immediate and proximal cause is chemical as mentioned below, and changing diet does reduce excitation a lot. But it could not be enough to curtail homosexuality totally if not for the Oedipus complex, the crystalisation of the otherwise natural desire for the mother but pent-up and frustrated by years of continence as a child, when having sex should actually be of the utmost importance.
Hence the superlative hormonal change of a pathological kind of puberty compounded by years of frustration triggers the often degenerative, mindless thirst for sex in adolescents.
Because of the total absence of early initiation plus our whole culture telling blatant lies about the joys of marriage and/or
normative heterosexuality - and boys, not realizing what happens, can’t help but pour all their transcendental hopes into the new program initiating.
The frustrated libido then invests entirely in the path of breeding, automatically seeking males to provide for her and her future babies, which girls just can’t stop thinking about.
And as logical companion to this unconscious shift toward the breeding program, jealousy settles as so deeply rooted a part of our daily thinking most people can not fathom living without, no more than without language or cloths. At the same time, the qualities linked to matter and organization will take on an inordinate importance, to the detriment of genius and intuition linked to the metapsychic, to the spiritual world. This is the heart of the cross-drive analysis, the most far-reaching piece of the theory.
Why is the bedroom so cold? You’ve turned away on your side
Is my timing that flawed? Our respect runs so dry
Yet there’s still this appeal that we’ve kept through our lives
Concurrently, this Oedipus complex locks people in couples or the
2-1 model by amping up the
natural posessiveness with a deap-seated fear of loosing our partner… and thus, the projected substitute for the parent (of usually the opposite sex) we invested all our hopes in during childhood). If we could actually make love to our parents, we would not see such a regressive, immature relationship to the opposite sex. We would also get find some real energy in incest, especially as before puberty the brain can not yet function on the breeding mode, therefore still feeling magic as we should. Without that initiation, most people are doomed.
Next, in terms of evolutionary psychology, experience show that across the whole animal kingdom the best offpsring are obtained by a female by copulating in rapid succession, if not at the exact same time, by as much partners as practically possible, each sperm ferociously competiting for the ovule. Studies prove that the female body has an insane power of discrimination, within each ejaculate as well as between them.
Ergo, even if demented religious fundamentalists along with athetists were right and that the purpose of life is to reproduce, enforcing monogamy and making cheating immoral or illegal would suppress sexual competition and thus undermine evolution !we can prove that outlawing or making immoral polygamy and prosmiscuity is actually the worst policy imaginable for our genes.
- The male’s interest is to impregnate a wide number of females and keep them for himself, especially if he has to care for the children.
- The female’s interest is to maximize her chance and mate with the best males (plural) to give the best genetics for her children, and convince one male to care for her and her children.
This is the best scenario nature has come up in a competitive interest: in a competitive setting, males and females have opposed interest.
Politically, the logical outcome of masculine and feminine debase breeding instincts are these:
- What male conservatists (machists in general) do is to create a society in the interest of males and males only, buying social peace by ensuring every man gets his females (plural, if possible) to breed and penetrate away from other men’ sight.
The Shariah laws.
Because reproductively males (or Negroes) are only interested in a female’s womb and it is unique, so to please everyone a perverted patriarchy will assign females as to individual males, and protect them from all others.
- What feminists wish all men to be shared in common to women, who can use them as inoffensive, spineless sexual playthings as they please. We get a world identical to the one the movie Barbie pictures, or the one in Lysistrata Or Woman’s Future and Future Woman by Ludovici.
And because what females need is men’ sperm, which is virtually unlimited, a matriarchal society will nearly always praise unlimited promiscuity, while castrating men politically one way or the other… mostly by appealing to their thirst for sex, changing all men into the male feminist beta ally type pandering to women, exchanging their dignity for the right to have sex.
Even disregarding the female power fantasy, the blind promiscuity Barbie portrayed is evolutionarily terrible: we should not provide for the children of people we don’t like or respect.
In evolved animal societies, males try to confiscate female reproduction (emphasis on
try: female adultery is universal), keeping it for themselves and a few other males they like and usually to which they are related (wolves packs, tiger ambushes and lion prides), to the point of killing cubs of an unknown father.
But more intelligent social animals (primates and cetaceans in particular) identify not to a small family, but to the group within which they live.
Chimpanzees and bonobos differ but everyone being given its chance to woo females and reproduce, and more often than not groups’ members are very related genetically, if not properly consanguineous. Hence, our instincts evolved to consider group interests has become more important than the individual’s. Altruism and
fair play make sense genetically in tightly-knit small groups.
Behold the glorious matriachal Hereros, who could not help but chimp out against German civilians, until the White man taught them took them down a few pegs.
Queenz assured of their position stop working out and get ugly.
Especially when fathers individually don’t dedicate much resource on children.
From an evolutionary perspective, from males’ perspective sex and babies are good but if females can give no assurance of their discernment, we have no reason to provide for them.
We are humans, and our interest are that of the entire White race: we do not want babies to be our own above all else, instead we want the best for our group, our collective, which is our entire race.
Even when it comes to breeding only, we should practice promiscuity between brothers and sisters of sound instinct and genetics, who can trust each other with the responsability of perpetuating the ever superior race, not unlike what chimpanzee and bonobos do implicitely.
Hypergamic hypergamists on the other hand, can not be trusted anything, especially not the interest of the White race. They lack any discernment and will happily hump negroes and objective subhumans, for superficial aesthetic reasons, or to feel superior. As such a matriarchal community is almost always a group of women (or men) jacking off collectively at the sound of how great they are, only seeing society only as a means to stroke their own ego or sex, with no one willing to sacrifice anything for anyone else, or make any effort.
Bottom line is, the feminist Barbie supremacist power fantasy is still at the end of the day an unconscious breeding fantasy, the female equivalent of Sharia law, and just like it caused by cooking on one hand and resentment from years of normative heterosexuality on the other.
A Different Heterosexuality
How do we overcome jealousy ?
Can we purge from our soul the taint of Oedipal fixations on a Mother figure coupled with artificial excitation of mating instincts, to regain innocence, peace of mind and natural psychosexual structures ?
Can we get rid of the coital fantasies ?
Yes, a man can get rid all dependencies on women however that process is difficult. In order to reignate the little but undying stamp of pure metasexual instincts left rotting for years into the recess of one’s mind and burn away the filthy coital conditioning, one must:
- Rediscover his homosexual side and explore it in depth, reawakening his desire for a healthy masculine body, by all varieties of sucking licking and penetrating, paying attention to finding the uttermost satisfaction, in order to recalibrate his own Unconscious, and reconnect with one’s inner man.
- Establish an harmonious relationship with the other sex, away from the compulsive need to project the Mother (on one hand) or the little girl on all girls. And most importantly, away from the obsession of coitus.
The Oedipus complex only harms the psyche so far as it stays an unconscious complex. To uproot the influence a complex has on our mind, one must become fully conscious of it, in the old psychoanalytical fashion.
But when it comes to incest our approach has a major difference from Freud’s: we state that it is only not only common to harbor those desires, but that they are the key to paradise. We do not want to make peace with the fact society is incompatible with realizing the Oedipus8. We want to burn the world and recreate anew.
To incest, and accept that life has been unfair not in giving that desire, but in bringing you in a society forbidding its realization. Society is responsible, for dooming us to a life of fruitless and mostly unconscious longing for our mother, father, brother or sister. From a different (mostly genetic and anthropological) perspective we work to publicize the truth about incest, about the racial, metaphysical and very sexual paradise which we all lost.
To be burning with the wish to bury yourself in mother, is not wrong, but it should have been done a long time ago, and done thoroughly. Then a correct relationship with the rest of womanhood could have been built, without the delusion of finding love and transcendence with any adult female outside one’s relatives. But which could be lived (emphasis on
could) within the family, was never meant to work with normal aged females.
Vaginas hold a special almost metaphysical sway on men, bewitching them due to the unholy conjunction of cooking’s base instincts hyperexcitability and metasexual frustration9.
This inherent risk with any involvement with females (from the perspective of males, since let’s be real, cultures always center around them) show very strongly in all chivalrous cultures, in history and mythology. The idea to adore the female archetype as a beacon of hope but without letting desire consume you. There is the prevailing idea of a willing
sacrificer in the worship of the lady.
Alphaville tells it very well:
I said: I want you, Baby,
I said: I want some more
I said: I never ever felt it like that moment before
She’s an assassin,
She’s melting steel in my heart
But I long for more.
She said: I want your body,
She said: I want your soul
She said: A fallen angel takes it but she’ll never let go
She’s an invader
She’s from another world
But I beg for more and more
She’s raising feelings cutting like a knife
She’s pouring fire into my liquid life
There’s no escaping from her mysteries,
She gives me kisses of the strangest kind
She says: I know you’ll like it,
So come over here
She says: Just let that rhythm filter
Through your body, dear
and then she…
She always did it and she always will
She’ll stay that hunter
’till the end of time
We tend to perceive female sexuality on a coital level as intrinsically dangerous and ravenous, feeding off virile energy and emasculating us. No better illustration exists than the world-wide primeval myth of the vagina dentata.
Each sex has its own set of unconscious inborn basic narrative or picturesque patterns, from which we generate either unconscious content or artistic and cultural productions of all kinds (up to foundational myths at the core of all societies) featuring our strongest fears in order to protect us from the risk of spiritual destruction that an unnatural sexuality carries, and let’s be honest, carried out already (seeing the state humanity arrived in).
This inborn mental function10 evolved to protect our most important assets (our spiritual, metapsychic integrity), we call mythogenesis, on throttle since the start of cooking as evidenced by the strikingly profuse amount of the Paleolithic Venuses, figures we found scattered over all of Europe up to Asia Minor (Anatolia, current Turkey).
In real life situations, the content of actual fantasies most often take after mixed traits, not entirely pure nor impure, between good (the metasexual) and evil (the
bestial). If caricatural machistic (or the simpering, beta-male kind for the matter) heterosexuality exemplify true degeneracy, one could consider on the other hand that sodomizing girls acts as a natural counter-balancing drive, the polar opposite of degraded heterosexuality, thus helping in freeing up the libido invested in the breeding instinctive program.
We explained that the model of the jealous couple was a byproduct of the breeding instinctive program, hence dominant - while not successful ! - in lower species but inoperant in higher species on their way to domesticate sexuality in service of metapsychic evolution.
One can wonder: how can the White race be saved by making a million babies each, if a single coitus may doom our eternal soul ?
The Immaculate Conception rejects the idea of a divine child born out of copulation. Dracula feeds on the blood of his partners. For a century, the strongest of cinema has revolved around the same problem. May 68 advocated making love, not war…
Many cultures, such as Catholic Europe and Ancient Greece and Rome, used to draw a strong line between marital duties in the community-sanctioned marriage (aimed respectively at maintaining the community or provide citizens/soldiers for the State), and love, sexuality, pleasure.
People use to compartmentalize, being unable to stop their depravation simply put it in a different mental and social category , to save their higher aspirations as much as possible, placing the same women they would inevitably high above them. Normally the women we fuck are kept separate, in time or persons. For instance, Italians worship their mother and daughters and would not let another man approach them, oblivious to the fact they themselves had to take away someone’s daughter or sister.11
This dichotomy made of wilful ignorance and obligate splitting allows people to continue on living in society, only letting go of this self-imposed stabilizing pressure in specific situations, ideally wars away from home or in the worst case scenario, revolutions and civil wars with it s load of insane wholesale massacres, families reaching for each other’s throat.12 How to explain such a happening if not by the gushing out of a hitherto dormant mass of uncontrollable savage resentment, then amplified by feedback-induced madness ?
Energetic relationships simply needs to dominate, to then feed the occasional births, as announciated in visions, prophetic dreams. In nature, breeding instincts woudl simply stay under control of the metasexual/metapsychic program, and we wouldn’t breed more than a few times per life (to maintain sane population levels) without a need for intellectual birth control.
This is the correct interpretation of the Immaculate Conception myth: breeding and pregnancies are a natural function, a very important one at that, and shouldn’t contradict higher aspirations, one reason being the later (the metapsychic plane of love) having evolved much later, from the framework of reproductional sexuality, hence can only take into account. As a matter of fact Isis was goddess of magic, virginity, sexuality and motherhood.
Incidentally Isis was married to her brother, reputed to bring about agriculture of cereals and was cut in many pieces by his brother Seth, the personification of a chaotic yet spiritually sterile sexuality. An allusion to schizoid dissociative tendencies, whose association with cereals (wheat in particular) is well-known. Their association to a disturbed sexuality however, is less known, except by us. In contrast, Isis and her twin Nephtys, both loved Osiris their brother so much that they magically pieced together his whole and resurrects him as well as magically give birth to a child. This created the After-life, an eternal existence beyond life and death for everyone.
Lastly, the experience in Montramé established points toward the existence, in a raw context, of a reliable natural anticonceptional mechanism innate to females’ body, under nervous or/and hormonal control of the unconscious, an ability known by science for many species but not until now in humans. Even in near total absence of consideration for pregnancies and protection or pills unexpected pregnancy were notably sparse if existing at all, unlike the avalanche one could expect despite the absurd amount of chaotic fucking taking place.
The real issue might be that a slighty impure unconscious (or very conscious) attitude from either partner will infect the woman, initiating a pregnancy: sadly an almost automatic occurence in society given the biological innate susceptibility of women to the instinctive reproductive complex.
- We do not advocate for any sudden change of laws regarding the age of consent with prepubescent children.
We strongly oppose this but certainly not out of moral concerns: inter-generational sexual relationships are commonplace with apes and older civilizations (or primitive people), and in of themselves holy. Most adults are today way too degraded, ugly inside and out, For such a contact to result in a positive outcome. Still in the Middle Age, testimonies abound213.
Besides, dramatic social responses would not disappear overnight, as the history of the homosexual movement these last 50 years proved. Until a profund change of attitude in the West sexual intercourses with a child, because of society, will almost necessarily be traumatic, and will always put the child (and yourself) in big troubles, be it legal or social.
It is undeniable that in itself these relationships are possible and can be experienced positively, even a cursory knowledge of fictional or ethnological literature, not to mention the observation of animals should be enough to convince you of this. Because sexuality only marginally concerns itself with reproduction, it stands to reason that it wouldn’t be limited anymore to fertile individuals: we say this here and will repeat it over and over.
In accordance with history, biology, a century of clinical psychology and the personal testimonies of both
abusers and consenting victims, most keeping from a positive to a delighted memory and living productive lives with no discernable trauma of any kind, we claim that a healthy society should encourage touching and pleasure-bringing acts of all nature, whenever they are driven by empathy and love and met natural criteria, the first one a completely positive outcome.
While in our research on pederasty, which includes both girls and boys, While elsewhere on this website we expound the value of sodomy, it should bespeak more our wish to fix that which is by far the most neglected than any kind of obsession. Consented with girls from the age of 8 to 13 (up to the very first menstruation to be precise) and the incredible diversity of anal and oral and digital touchings we see in nature - and even monkeys feature a more expansive repertoire than ours - should flourish.
The place of vaginal penetration would probably make for at most 30% of heterosexual contacts, which would in and of themselves, be the minor part. We believe the place of vaginal penetration would probably make for at most 30% of heterosexual contacts (with most of them being double penetrations), while heterosexuality in general would dwindle, if we are to believe apes.
There is enough material available here to quench your thirst for evidences or debates, that is why we rather choose to stress instead the reasons why we oppose sudden changes of laws:
- Firstly as a child grows up in a highly repressive environment or cultural norms and talks about his experience, she will be labeled as a pervert and forced to denounce her lover, or suffer consequences of various kinds depending on the country in consideration, from legal punishment to social isolation to outright tribal or religious murder.
- Secondly, the reason people abhor the idea of having sex with children is because they themselves live love on an utterly uninspired material or
carnallevel which amounts to missing the purpose of their existence, and being unable to fathom anything else than they experienced, they project by default their own gross wretchedness on to relationships they know nothing about.
Even if the child doesn’t talk, there is a high chance she - girls are much more likely to turn on their lovers later - will cave in to social pressure and gradually convince herself that she has been abused, without a precise insight into the nature of love and sexuality - which is the object of metapsychoanalysis - only the strongest wills could cope with the pressure.
It cannot reasonably be expected from a child to have the strength of will to take on society and his parents, as most adults cannot either. Children need a lot of love from elders, that very fact understandably makes them highly susceptible to influence, weak to adults. They remain still children after all, with a very wanting education to boot. They will distort their memories to fit with social narratives, the only ones they have access to, as provided from their parents or otherwise figures of authority.
And as the psyche fractures, psychosis (technically, confusing reality with one’s own fantasy or wish) takes hold, and the lover has become a rapist in their mind. This happening is an almost absolute inevitability.
This memory revision can occur immediately after, or often years after, puberty when the adolescent begins to experience love and sex on the same degraded plane symbolized by rape. Then he will automatically tend to project on what he has experienced as a child, the concepts and prejudices of their parents, especially when he starts to live them himself (
fuck the girls). All the more easily, when said adult also projected on the figure of a woman on the child,
fucking with little regard for the subtlety such
romances need to entail, lest them fail very badly.
A projection of the modern perception of sexuality as something degrading is legitimate, as far as someone raised in our society is concerned. Involving a child in the grotesque and disgusting games that most married couples experience is traumatic, and will permanently tarnish the child’s natural aspirations for the beauty and transcendence of love. Indeed there is no shortage of low-grade pedophiles and faggots, whose inner imagery sometimes (on internet in particular) often look close to torture for anyone sane.
Though I must stress, this is only pure fantasy. Even among prisoners, truly violent sadistic rapists are an extreme minority: most pedophilic
crimes are either consenting, or sorry mishaps from low-IQ morons who couldn’t control themselves.
Overall traumatisms when not purely fantasized come from adults manipulating the child (consciously or not) but hardly ever from the acts themselves.
But even if everything is done perfectly with the best of intentions, which is almost unconceivable today with this food and the lack of initiation in early childhood, in most cases the victim under the influence of the dominant morality might interpret the relationship as rape, afterwards. There is simply no mental category corresponding to an relationship with minor that would be inherently good. Until society changes significantly, there is no hope for pedophilia whatsoever.
Even Japan discarded its past Age of Consent of 13 years-old, and cranked down on
child abuse more and more.
And none among us wish to get arrested. So let us pray for the collapse of the Nation-states, when technically speaking nothing will be illegal or legal than what our conscience decides, because there will be no anonymous repressive central authority to destroy the life of innocent people anymore.
Talking about destroying children, this is a good place to talk about genital mutilation:
Some laws and policies will carry a specific ideological significance and potency, in particular concerning genital mutilations. Due to their effects on people’s mind which compare with nothing else spiritually and psychologically, short of life-long imprisonment and torture, these practices (for what the West is concerned with, circumcision) are an enemy to Europe of the highest order, and history has shown that an inspired society can not function harmoniously with a large portion of the population being circumcised.
Closely associated with circumcision, the Eternal Jew lies below:
The single most deadly ideological enemy of the West when it comes to people (unlike Chinese), he penetrates and twists every society, company, party and discourse, hiding in plain sight as a fellow White.
They stand responsible for the introduction of materialism in our civilization, the grafting of a completely foreign religion which wiped out and drowned in blood our native European spiritual traditions, then warped its memories and interpretation to the point of projecting Christian morality on the past (including but not limited to their puritan disdain for Greco-Roman pederasty and homosexuality).
But worse: Jews introduced circumcision and Jewish sexual thinking among Europeans. This is their single worst evil deed. From the very beginning, the purpose of circumcision was to chastise and damage men, to reduce them to a state of impotence and disconnection from the divine in himself and others so inescapable, they would resign and seek refuge in a lifeless sadistic religion.
The intent has always been clear:
With regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for it is, in my opinion, the wish to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible. It has been thought that circumcision perfects what is defective congenitally. This gave the possibility for everyone to raise an objection and to say: How can natural things be defective so that they need to be perfected from outside, all the more because we know how useful the foreskin is for the member? In fact this commandment has not been prescribed with a view to perfecting what is defective congenitally, but to perfecting what is defective morally.
This blatantly means that they needed to remove most pleasure from men to focus on praying to their monstrous God, whose eradication from the cultural life of the West is a sacred task.
Circumcision is extremely painful and traumatic. Some infants go into shock. It also results in behavioral and nervous system changes. No anesthetic effectively prevents the pain. See Infant Responses.
Circumcision is associated with over 100 different potential complications and risks. For example, they include heavy bleeding, infection, surgical injury, and in rare cases, death. See Over 100 Known Complications and Risks.
The foreskin on the average adult male is about 12 sq.in. and is highly sensitive. It protects the head of the penis, improves sexual pleasure, and eases intercourse.
Therefore, circumcision reduces sexual sensation by reducing the number of nerves, up to one-third of the total. Second, the foreskin contains muscle fibers which stretch and contract as the foreskin glides over the penis during coitus. This stretching and contracting further stimulates the nerve endings of the foreskin.
The consequences, as the Talmud said so eloquently, are properly unfathomable, beyond intellectual understanding, as it touches the very soul, which passes through sex. Eventually, trade and any and all relationships with countries promoting (like the USA) circumcision or that kind of practice or permitting their happening on their soil shall discontinue, and possible leverage made use of, in order to further the fight against International Jewry, and thus further the regeneration of Europeans.
Society should value life through its vital and racial qualities hence such an act forever preventing normal human feelings equals barring any possible access to an intimate relationship with the world itself, a fate tantamount to a life-long torture, more grieving than death.
Punishing circumcision by death is the only appropriate sentence (minus more medieval tortures which would only begin to approximate what a baby feels). The message to the international community would be crystal clear. And as a bonus, puts a halt to any subsequent Muslim immigration.
At the same time, we shall retroactively send to prison or execute all physicians having performed genital mutilations and not express sincere public regrets, and condemn to death any such person entering its borders.
Rape has been seen very differently through history. Most cultures have disapproved of it, nearly all in fact, to no one’s surprise: only someone desperate would resort to force to get sexual attention. Everyone would be appalled by the pain, blood and injuries, that much is obvious, and the criminal would be swiftly punished, if found, most often by the family of the victim, assuming she has one.
In the past, justice concerned more the honor of the clan, of the wronged husband and the risk of unknowingly birthing and nurturing the rapist’ child, at times where knowledge of biology paled compared to ours.
However our current femininist culture is of the rare on record, seeing in forced copulations something as diabolical as do we do today, the killing of the soul, leaving a taint even for generations to come ! Many cultures, matriarchal and patriarchal, considered the act pathetic or disgraceful but didn’t care much either way, or deemed the female victim partly to blame. Matrioski relate about Trobriandese, how a woman was raped and after the fact commented
it wasn’t so bad.
Simply put, when people aren’t too repressed and sex is available, no one but morons would rape. But no one at all would show sadism, and no woman would even resist to the point of fighting for her life, because her life or well-being would not be in danger in the slightest, so already compulsive impulses had no occasion to escalate.
Rape exists in nature as a valid breeding strategy, but in humans only happens under cooked conditions when low self-control meets pent-up sexual and/or energetic frustration (and resentment, toward one woman or all of them) that become compulsive. Forceful demonstrations, up to and including rapes, can be understood as desperate calls to help, turning sour. In a situation where acting out is a psychological necessity, the guilt and fear of punishment the more things risk getting out of hand, with victims dying as a consequence. Because sex is not just about pleasure… that much can be obtained with a hand or two.
Behind, we find the need for energy, the food of the soul. The most important food in existence. That explains why its lack can make people mad, crazy with resent against society and those they deem should provide him with said sustainance… women or children. As such, sexual distress is society’s disease most of the time, and we should try to look with compassion to sexual offenders who carry its symptoms, when no serious hurt has been done seriously14. In those cases social shaming is often judged sufficient15.
On the contrary cultures where accepting sex easily out of compassion or pity is no big deal, lead to much more manageable sexual excess when they do happen.
Now, we National-Naturalists - believe in a different kind of rape, of much socio-political value. What if coercion could be used as a teaching instrument, when people too far gone refuse to hear anything and change their optics about homosexuality incest or pedophilia ?
Pain is not compatible with a functional metasexuality, this invariably causes an autonomic clamping of muscles, of the butt, instead of the necessary relaxing, especially indispensable when it comes to penetration of any sort. This invariably turns rape into pain, and we want to avoid that absolutely. But coercion in and of itself, is not incompatible.
What if a regular adult heterosexual man, without any energy, were to be strapped to a bed, gently explained the situation, while being mounted by a ten years-old girl until frothing orgasm ?
The process would then repeat over the days as often as necessary. Because energy and physical reactions are not, and can not be under conscious control, due to the accumulating sense of guilt and patient explanations, orgasms in such conditions would quickly achieve to convert the person under treatment to the truth.
Regular straight people are precisely those who have not been able to connect this dimension at all in childhood or adolescence. It is likely that enough humiliation we can break down certain internal barriers.
The same basic principle behind torture and brainwashing, with psychological humiliation and pleasure instead of pain and distress dismantling not the Ego, in order to realize the truth by confronting the victim with the reality of his or her situation and unconscious longing.
Energy is to some degree a physical phenomena, touching the deepest part of the self, transcending the normal mind. As such, accompagnied with clear propaganda, the rape therapy as defined above would function much better than torture, actually helping the part of the Unconscious of the victim yearning for true sexual release.
Any pain or threat of violence would on the opposite, provide too easy an escape route for the mind, giving it culprits to incriminate, beside most likely killing off sexual reactions in both men and women.
The past is full of stories of soldiers forcing cruelly forcing family members to have sex with one another to humiliate them, most of these stories being false, as most always degenerate soldiers capable of that, such Mongols or Buryati in the Russian or Soviet army, would invariably do the raping themselves. In a different register but seeking the same result, Tantric exercises in the Tibet of yore[^unfortunate] included many practices with the express intent of breaking through cultural conditioning and moral constructs limiting oneself. Unfortunately tantrism never sought to relished in breeding fixations (seeking nubile girls to penetrate) while we intend to break people from them, by any means congruent with natural and human laws.
In the case of a male victim, the “aggressor” being penetrated obviously eases the process, but a little girl could be changed to an older daughter if the purpose is to teach the virtue of incest. Or a boy, if we need to inculcate homosexuality. Teaching passive penetration would be challenging in two ways. One needs to avoid pain, which sodomy does cause very easily with constraint if one is not extremely patient, especially under cooking. A lot of patience, and force-feeding of raw food, could work, but we must also maintain in the person to be reeducated the illusion of culpability, so as to turn it against her.
With vaginal penetration (by a little boy or brother) lubrification is usually too easy already, so there is much less problem. Concretely the choice of practice to impose would depend on the pleasure and the shame given. Reaching pleasure proves unconscious consent, while penetrations have the advantages of matching most unconscious representations of “real sex”, and being easier to impose (with erections and lubrication both escaping conscious control).
We can - the first of a numerous times in this site - trace a parallel with the Dune universe. In it clones are named gholas, and because all our memories are stored genetically (assumedly by extrasensory means) it is possible to reawaken the original memories until the moment of collection of the cells, up to one’s moment of death.
The first means involves emotional trauma:
The reawakening procedure was thoroughly fixed in his awareness, though. He knew that gholas once had been awakened by conditioning them unconsciously to attempt murder on someone they loved. The ghola psyche, shattered and forced to reassemble, was always psychologically scarred. This new technique left the scars in the one who managed the process.
Emotional pain warred with his physical pains. Duncan felt incomplete. Something remained suppressed within him. The reawakening was not finished. He stared angrily at Teg. Was there more? Teg had been brutal. Necessary brutality? Was this how you had to restore a ghola?
But another method involves trauma of another kind… a sexual collision or the fight against it. And this superior method could reawaken thousands years of memories from past clones.
Murbella murmured in his right ear: “My hands are fire.”
Her body hid the faces behind the plaz. He felt the fire wherever she touched him
Abruptly, the flame engulfed his mind. Hidden places within him came alive. He saw red capsules like a string of gleaming sausages passing before his eyes. He felt feverish. He was an engorged capsule, excitement flaring throughout his awareness. Those capsules! He knew them! They were himself . . . they were . . .
All of the Duncan Idahos, original and the serial gholas flowed into his mind. They were like bursting seedpods denying all other existence except themselves.
The memories flooded him until he wondered how he could hold them all. He gasped in the grip of the serial memories that cascaded into him. All of those lives! All of those lives!
… that how the first “sexual collision” with Murbella restored memories of other ghola-lifetimes? Deep resistance against imprinting?
We expand on specific topics, like men and women relationships, or the pedophilia issue, homosexuality and incest, so I advise you to roam the site, and consult the specifics topics whose clickbait titles, carefully handpicked, shouldn’t fail to catch your attention.
Realizing the truth of these matters is imperative, our very survival depends on it, as the crucial link needed to form a nation that will stand the sands of time, has always been conscious racial cohesion. There has been many movements in the past that exalted racial chauvinism with nothing to show for it, their goal was to found a White ethno-state completely detached from the social practices that made our people great in the first place, their relentless reactionary dogmas and purity spiraling only lead to hate, frustration, destruction and despair, and the suppression of individuals within their own groups that recognized these blatant contradictions.
Many will still retort that the White race is dwindling and reducing the number of breeders endangers it, as Himmler claimed. This argument makes no sense as even given an interrupted chain of pregnancies, the amount of intercourses required for impregnation is very small. On the contrary, the elimination of labor pains after a mere few years of an instinctive diet will make pregnancies attractive and desirable.
However we differ from those people because we are not bound by any contrarian desire nor neurotic compulsion which manipulates our judgment, rendering us insensitive or spiteful towards the very forms of love that allowed true high cultures to blossom. Eros, which includes sexuality, is the greatest motivator for in-group preferences within your racial family as satisfied people know nothing will ever satiate their desire better than their own ethnos.
A good racist encourages anything creating stronger bonds between racial brethren. The logical outcome of love is sex and no honest person can claim to love his own people while endorsing socially repressive policies facilitating its destruction. The need for repression would imply the innate corruption of nature, a hallmark of Judaism, the undying mortal enemy of Nordic humanity, and life on Earth as a whole.
Love is the binding force of the universe, it carries the spiritual currents of inspiration driving our race forward, it brings out our full potential by exceeding the limitation of matter, connecting forlorn glorious past and limitless future. Its absence destroys social cohesion - pushing people to look for
greener pastures in racially foreign countries, peoples and cultures.
Our researchs and conclusions, all taken together, portray a world where people would stay with their family with the longest time within extended tribes, with their sisters and brothers and cousins, and would raise the children together, sleeping together and teaching how to mature into master the divine forces of creation they were created to handled. Love and pleasure should be as natural and spontaneous, and no more stress-inducing or complex-ridden, than caressing one’s hair.
We argue that the frequently implicit assumption of DSB as ancestral has not been rigorously examined, and instead hypothesize an ancestral condition of indiscriminate sexual behaviours directed towards all sexes. By shifting the lens through which we study animal sexual behaviour, we can more fruitfully examine the evolutionary history of diverse sexual strategies.↩︎
In Sologne, known for its insalubrity and poverty, Abbé Tessier, sent on a mission by the Royal Society of Medicine to investigate ergot rye, known for its abortifacient power, noted:
Women are very fertile, although they are not regulated before eighteen or twenty years of age: they cease to be so at thirty-six and forty. They have up to fifteen children. Both sexes are very inclined to love, I was very surprised to see this passion develop early, to the point that boys, even seven or eight years old, have sex with girls of their own age. The worthy abbot emphasizes that this precocious inclination is due to the
free communication of boys and girls who guard their flocks together and sleep in the same room, but this nevertheless does not hasten an early puberty in any way.
This approach and perception of love as a whole begets high cultures and eternal values wherever it blooms, in contrast to the self-centered hedonism of degenerate drug addicts and leftists making making the bulk of today’s homosexuals and wrongly called
feelingswould be a mistake because these sensations are beyond feelings, it is not possible to separate the sensation of energy from the raw textures of consciousness, or you could say the two of them are more intrinsically bound than other sensory fields like sight or sounds. A reason might be that extrasensory perceptions come from within, from consciousness itself. ↩︎
For strange reasons they are not named in the English version of the article. The French version is more complete.
The anal glands, then called Hermann’s and Defosses’ glands, are located at varying depths in the wall of the anal canal, partly between the layers of the internal and external sphincter (in the “intersphincter plane”). Six to eight in number, they come together at the level of the anal crypts near the columns of Morgagni. (translated)↩︎ ↩︎
These anal glands appear as glandular ducts to which no function is recognized and whose origin is unknown. They are lined with a cylindrical and stratified epithelium, identical to that of the mucosa of the transitional zone of the anal canal. They are present in all individuals and usually number six to ten. Each gland opens into the anal lumen at one of the crypts of the pectineal line, with one crypt accommodating two or three glandular orifices.↩︎
And yet many women do have a difficulty with getting properly wet, needing some more mechanical titillation of the breasts much like a cow for its milk. If that adequate description disgust you, blame people, not me. No man can deny that this really is the absolute state of love. ↩︎
I assume that most readers will be either males, or adult females, hence most likely mothers. But the Oedipus complex can really apply to all older relatives indifferently, not just the mother, and for both genders. ↩︎
Possibly their secretions might even act as pheromones, especially their glands and whole hormonal system superactivates, such as seen in other contexts, chemically amplifying the primitive urge to copulate in weak males. ↩︎
The universality of the denunciation of a fault inherent in sexuality, with regard to the postulate of its metapsychic finality, could encourage us to highlight an unconscious function responsible for deciphering non-verbalized errors:
we could thus define
mythogenesisin as an innate and therefore universal process, aiming, through sublimation and symbol, to rekindle awareness of lost values in us and restore them. One could see in it, like Freud, a simple defense by projection against internal suffering due to the vagaries of a repressive education. But we cannot rule out the hypothesis of a full-fledged psychic function, genetically determined in such a way as to guarantee the return to function of the PIM when living conditions systematically compromise its achievement.
It joins Jung’s interpretation of the Unconscious, impulsing changes and political or artistic movements through history by possessing individuals, in reaction to collectively perceived needs and opportunities for change.
The same broad lines are found in the myths of different cultures. Greek mythology represents the different aspects of the degradation of the human condition, from original faults symbolized for example by Typhon and Echidna, man and woman serpents, progenitors of all the monsters it depicts, including the sphinx of Thebes. Quetzalcóatl, intoxicated by his wife, unites with her and from there emerges all the misfortunes of the Aztecs.
Similarly, Freud talked of tender motionschoosing different objects than those subjects to sexual desire. Funnily enough he never mentioned
loveper se, not once in his library-filling heap of analyses instead using focusing on libido and desire or attachment. More than cynicism, he proved having an extraordinary insight into the nature of feelings.
The reality of mundaine love (of which he knew the gory ins and outs) is so fraught with with unhealthy, hidden and sinful content that a truly innocent feeling feeling is better deserved with an original expression with no such association. ↩︎
Much like the customary African ethnic wars, Hutu vs Tutsi among the most puzzling given the utter lack of tension right before husbands and wives responded murdered one another and their children in cold blood, in the most horrific ways. ↩︎
[ - September 21, 1601- ] Madame the Duchess of Bar, sister of the King, who considered the parts so well formed of this beautiful body, having cast her sight on those which made him the Dauphin, turning towards Madame de Panjas, his lady-in-waiting, told him that he was well endowed. These words were received with derision, which carried them to the ears of the King, who was close to the Queen.↩︎
[ - July 24, 1602- ] Louis takes pleasure and laughs out loud when the stireuse shakes his cock with her fingertip.
September 23#) Very cheerful, excited; he makes everyone kiss his guillery.
[ - September 30, Louis XII then is just 2 years old - ] At a quarter past twelve the Sieur de Bonières and his young daughter; he laughed out loud at her, rolls up, shows her his guillery, but especially to his daughter, because then holding her and laughing her little laugh he shakes his whole body. It is said that he meant finesse [ - that it was a salacious allusion- ] . At twelve-thirty the Baron de Prunay; there was in his company a little damsel; he rolled up his coat, showed him his cock with such ardor that he was quite beside himself. He lay down on his back to show it to her.
Obviously today more often that not rapes on adult women are much more violent, bloody unforgiveable and fueled by resent, quite rightfully as women right lobbies are responsible for the loss of much of the sexual freedom, with children in particular, that existed until the 1990s. Migrants are yet another case, subhuman filth who would not get sex any other way even in the most accepting of place, given how ugly and despicable subhumans they are. ↩︎
Trobriandese knew rapes but chose to ridicule those resorting to force… not to kill or even exile them.
The whole attitude of the Trobrianders towards sexual excess displays an appreciation of restraint and dignity, and an admiration for success; not only for what it gives to a man, but because it means that he is above any need for active aggression. The moral command not to violate, solicit, or touch is founded on a strong conviction that it is shameful; and shameful because real worth lies in being coveted, in conquering by charm, by beauty and by magic.↩︎